“Celebrity Gossip and Entertainment industry news”
A judge granted 50 Cent one weekend visit a month with his son Marquise. The hearing which took less than five minutes took place yesterday. Curtis Jackson didn’t even want to have eye contact with his baby momma during the court hearing. The judge said in addition to the one weekend per month, 50 is allowed to see his son one month in the summer and Marquise will also spend half of his school’s winter and spring breaks with his father. “50 is pleased this has been settled and looks forward to spending some quality time with his son,” the rapper’s attorney Brett Kimmel tells People. “We came to an agreement,” Tompkins told People after the hearing. “Despite my feelings for his father, I want Marquise and his father to have a healthy relationship. That’s what that time is for.”
As previously discussed, 50 Cent and his baby momma have been disputing since the mansion that 50 Cent bought her in Long Island was burnt down in a fire. Tompkins publicly blamed Jackson for starting the blaze in the midst of his attempts to evict her. The rap artist denied the allegation and in June filed a $20 million defamation lawsuit against her. This is so ugly, I feel bad for the kid!
Do you think the judge was being fair with the one weekend per month? Shouldn’t a father be able to see his child WHENEVER he wants?
3 Responses for "50 CENT GRANTED ONE WEEKEND A MONTH TO SEE SON!"
One, weekend a month is ridiculous and what about holidays. Men seem to always get the short end of the stick, these arrangements only secures her child support. If I were his attorney, I would have convinced him we must to fight for more time, and joint custody. His son is a young man, soon to be a teenager, and eventually a young black man, he needs just as much quality time with his father, as he does with his mother.
Sad really, guess this is just normal nowadays when you get too famous and a big ego. I love 50, but cmon, can’t yall get along for the sake of the child? I feel sorry for Miss Tompkins. 50 should be able to see his son whenever he wants to, why can’t he in the first place again?
The issue here is that a man wants to see his son and the mother is using him as timecard soo she can continue to get paid. I think the judge should allow the boy to voice his opinion. Tomkins lawyer is just trying to cash in on this he really could care less about her.We all know what next going to happen she will file a motion to have 50 pay for her legal defense.
Leave a reply